I don't talk much about lectures or philosophical discussions in this
blog, but I fully endorse them as cultural events. Your basic online
dictionary defines culture as "The arts and other manifestations of
human intellectual achievement regarded collectively." This definition
perfectly fits my own internal designation of "culture,"--what I want to
experience more of and examine my engagement with.
I
do regard thoughtful, smart presentations and discussions as proof of
intellectual achievement, (and therefore a part of the collective of
culture as a whole) and accordingly, I was very interested in the panel discussion
for NAU Theatre's staging of
"Nickel and Dimed" that was held on Nov. 17.
The play is based on the book,
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America
by Barbara Ehrenreich. The story follows as the author takes
minimum wage jobs, lives in hotels, and basically "tries to understand
the hardships and financial difficulties of the working
class in America." Many at NAU remember reading the book 6-7 years ago
as part of a one-campus/one-book type thing.
The panelists were chosen from various departments on
campus and in the city, and included
John Eastwood (Economics
and Statistics, NAU);
David McIntire (Permanent Affordability
Administrator, Housing Program, City of Flagstaff);
Jason Matteson (Dept. of Philosophy, NAU); and moderated by
Constance DeVereaux, (Dept. of Humanities and coordinator of the Program in Arts and Cultural Management, NAU.)
My friend and I liked the fact that they had a community member
who works with low income housing present- especially since he could
speak about living impoverished himself for a while. I really liked the
fact that one of the panelists was a single mom who practically raised
her kids in the library while she was getting her PhD. She talked about
how being a mom is one of the biggest impacts on your earning
potential.
One of the most informative issues raised,
however, was thinking about the ways in which we are institutionalized
in poverty or in wealth. For instance, my friend and I had an education
and support from families. We had a knowledge base of experience and
parental wisdom, and general know-how that taught us how to make our
clothes presentable for job interviews, pursue a degree to further our
economic advantage, and invest our meager amounts of money in things
that helped us get ahead. We may be cash-poor, but we have resources. A
lot of people who are classified at the "extreme poverty" level don't
know how to apply to college, get scholarships, or network.
This whole conversation started me thinking about making culture more
accessible in general. This is a guess, but I would venture to say that
a lot of people classified at the "extreme poverty" level are probably
intimidated by "culture" and don't feel comfortable or welcome at art
exhibits and museums, classical music performances, or even a play.
Which probably means that many people that are affected by the issues of
"Nickel and Dimed" won't be there to see it! What a shame! Art should
be available to everyone--it's an essential part of the human
experience.
It's a vicious cycle and a huge cultural
issue--and I am grateful that NAU Theatre is trying address the issue of
poverty and bring attention to the problem.
"I hope
that talking about what we can do as a community, dealing with working
class issues, will bring better awareness to social issues of poverty
that we're dealing with now," said Season Ellison, director of "Nickel
and Dimed."
By the way, there's still time to catch the play. "Nickel and
Dimed" will stage Nov. 30- Dec. 3 at 8 p.m. and Dec. 4 at 2 p.m. at the
Studio Theatre. (Call 928-523-5661 for tickets.)